Post by account_disabled on Jan 18, 2024 5:02:22 GMT -5
The lawyer of a citizen residing in the Netherlands, accused in the National Court for the crime of drug trafficking, requests that the Chamber, under the protection of DM 2009/829/JAI of the Council of October 23, 2009, relating to the application, between States members of the EU, of the principle of mutual recognition of resolutions on surveillance measures as a substitute for provisional detention, be allowed to reside in the Netherlands, until the oral trial is held .
In October 2018, members of the Civil Guard and the National Police arr Whatsapp Number List ested 16 people in Malaga for the alleged commission of a crime against public health, seizing a cache of more than 6,000 kilos of cocaine, 300,000 euros in cash, various weapons of war, ammunition and high-end vehicles.
The prison sentences requested by the Prosecutor's Office for the accused range between 11 and 40 years, depending on the type of their participation in the alleged criminal plot. For their part, the fine penalties reach stratospheric values, given that the market value of the seized drugs is around 1,000 million euros, as can be seen from the indictment of the Public Prosecutor's Office.
After spending several months in preventive detention, some of the accused agreed to provisional release by virtue of an Order issued by the Central Court of Instruction, subject to compliance with certain measures such as the establishment of an address for the purposes of notifications, the obligation to appear apud-acta on the 1st and 15th of each month at the Court closest to their habitual residence, as well as the prohibition of leaving the national territory without prior judicial authorization .
On the eve of the oral trial, the Criminal Chamber of the National Court hears the request of one of the accused to reside in the Netherlands before the trial is held based on the following arguments:
The European Surveillance Order (OEV) Council Framework Decision 2009/829/JHA of 23 October 2009 on the application, between Member States of the European Union, of the principle of mutual recognition to resolutions on surveillance measures as a replacement for provisional detention - Framework Decision 2008/909/JHA -, introduces the possibility of transmitting a surveillance measure that does not involve deprivation of liberty from the Member State in which a non-resident is suspected of having committed an offence, to Member State in which he resides. In this way, the suspect may be subject to a surveillance measure in his usual environment before the trial takes place in the foreign Member State. The European Surveillance Order can be used for all pre-trial surveillance measures that do not involve deprivation of liberty, for example, restriction of movement and the duty to report periodically.
In October 2018, members of the Civil Guard and the National Police arr Whatsapp Number List ested 16 people in Malaga for the alleged commission of a crime against public health, seizing a cache of more than 6,000 kilos of cocaine, 300,000 euros in cash, various weapons of war, ammunition and high-end vehicles.
The prison sentences requested by the Prosecutor's Office for the accused range between 11 and 40 years, depending on the type of their participation in the alleged criminal plot. For their part, the fine penalties reach stratospheric values, given that the market value of the seized drugs is around 1,000 million euros, as can be seen from the indictment of the Public Prosecutor's Office.
After spending several months in preventive detention, some of the accused agreed to provisional release by virtue of an Order issued by the Central Court of Instruction, subject to compliance with certain measures such as the establishment of an address for the purposes of notifications, the obligation to appear apud-acta on the 1st and 15th of each month at the Court closest to their habitual residence, as well as the prohibition of leaving the national territory without prior judicial authorization .
On the eve of the oral trial, the Criminal Chamber of the National Court hears the request of one of the accused to reside in the Netherlands before the trial is held based on the following arguments:
The European Surveillance Order (OEV) Council Framework Decision 2009/829/JHA of 23 October 2009 on the application, between Member States of the European Union, of the principle of mutual recognition to resolutions on surveillance measures as a replacement for provisional detention - Framework Decision 2008/909/JHA -, introduces the possibility of transmitting a surveillance measure that does not involve deprivation of liberty from the Member State in which a non-resident is suspected of having committed an offence, to Member State in which he resides. In this way, the suspect may be subject to a surveillance measure in his usual environment before the trial takes place in the foreign Member State. The European Surveillance Order can be used for all pre-trial surveillance measures that do not involve deprivation of liberty, for example, restriction of movement and the duty to report periodically.